Back to Home
Back to Case Archive
CopyrightDismissed 15 April 2025

Cryogas Equipment Private Limited v. Inox India Limited and Others; LNG Express India Private Limited v. Inox India Limited and Others

2025 INSC 483

Court
Supreme Court of India
Bench
Surya Kant, J.; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J.
Outcome
Dismissed
Date of judgment
15/4/2025

Statutory provisions

Section 14, Copyright Act 1957 — Meaning of copyright and exclusive rightsSection 15, Copyright Act 1957 — Copyright in designs registered or capable of being registered under the Designs ActSection 62(2), Copyright Act 1957 — Jurisdiction of courts in copyright infringement suitsSection 2(c), Copyright Act 1957 — Definition of 'artistic work'Section 2(d), Designs Act 2000 — Definition of 'design'

Key issue

What are the definitive parameters for determining whether an engineering drawing qualifies as an 'artistic work' under the Copyright Act or a 'design' under the Designs Act, especially when considering the limitations imposed by Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act and the concept of 'functional utility'?

Summary

This case involves a dispute over copyright infringement concerning engineering drawings for cryogenic storage tanks and semi-trailers. The original plaintiff, Inox India Limited, claimed copyright in its proprietary engineering drawings and literary works. The defendants, Cryogas and LNG Express, argued that the drawings were designs registrable under the Designs Act and had lost copyright protection due to industrial application. The Supreme Court established a two-pronged test to distinguish between 'artistic work' under the Copyright Act and 'design' under the Designs Act, emphasizing the 'functional utility' of the article. The Court ultimately upheld the High Court's decision, which had set aside the Commercial Court's order to reject the plaint, thereby allowing the suit to proceed to trial. Result: Appeals against High Court's decision dismissed; High Court's rejection of Order VII Rule 11 application upheld; Commercial Court directed to conduct trial and decide interim injunction application.

Tags

#copyright#design law#Section 15(2) Copyright Act#functional utility test#intellectual property overlap#rejection of plaint
Judgment PDFOpen in new tab