PatentAllowed 12 November 2024
Comviva Technologies Limited v. Assistant Controller of Patents & Design
C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 492/2022
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Bench
- AMIT BANSAL, J.
- Outcome
- Allowed
- Date of judgment
- 12/11/2024
Statutory provisions
Section 117A, Patents Act 1970 — AppealsSection 15, Patents Act 1970 — Power of Controller to refuse or require amendments, etc., of applicationsSection 3(k), Patents Act 1970 — What are NOT inventions (specifically, business methods and computer programs 'per se')Section 2(1)(ja), Patents Act 1970 — Inventive step
Key issue
Whether a patent application for a secure electronic payment card authentication method, involving a computer program, is patentable despite being deemed a 'business method' or 'computer program per se' under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act.
Summary
This case involved an appeal against the refusal of a patent application for a method and devices for authenticating electronic payment cards. The Controller had rejected the application, citing that the claims described a 'business method' and 'computer programme per se,' making them non-patentable under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act. The High Court found that the invention, despite its components, primarily enhanced security for transactions rather than defining a business method or being solely a computer program. The court concluded the invention offered a technical solution to a technical problem in contactless payments. Therefore, the High Court overturned the Controller's decision and ordered the grant of the patent.
Result: The appeal was allowed; the Controller's refusal order was set aside and the Patent Office was directed to grant the patent for the subject application.
Tags
#patentability#Section 3(k)#business method#technical effect
Judgment PDFOpen in new tab
TM