PatentDismissed 11 May 2023
OpenTV Inc. v. The Controller of Patents and Designs and Anr
2023:DHC:3305
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Bench
- Justice Prathiba M. Singh
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- Date of judgment
- 11/5/2023
Statutory provisions
Section 3(k), Patents Act 1970 — Exclusions from patentability (business methods, computer programs)Section 2(1)(ja), Patents Act 1970 — Definition of 'inventive step'Section 10(4)(c), Patents Act 1970 — Requirements for sufficiency of disclosure in specificationSection 10(5), Patents Act 1970 — Requirements for definitiveness in claimsSection 11A, Patents Act 1970 — Publication of patent applicationsSection 15, Patents Act 1970 — Power of Controller to refuse or require amended applicationsSection 59, Patents Act 1970 — Amendments to applications and specificationsSection 117A, Patents Act 1970 — Appeals
Key issue
Can a patent be granted for a system and method designed to enable gifting of media, or does such an invention fall under the exclusion for business methods in Indian patent law?
Summary
This case involves an appeal against the refusal of a patent application for a "system and method to provide gift media." The Controller of Patents denied the patent on grounds that the invention constitutes a non-patentable business method under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, and that proposed claim amendments were impermissible. The court reviewed whether claims can be amended during appeal and if the invention is indeed a business method. It determined that while amendments are generally allowed if they don't broaden the scope, the core invention here is a business method, explicitly excluded from patentability in India. The court emphasized that the mere technical implementation of a business method does not make it patentable.
Result: Appeal for patent grant dismissed; the invention was deemed a non-patentable business method.
Tags
#patentability#business method#Section 3(k)#claim amendment#appellate review
Judgment PDFOpen in new tab
TM