Back to Home
Back to Case Archive
PatentDismissed 11 May 2023

OpenTV Inc. v. The Controller of Patents and Designs and Anr

2023:DHC:3305

Court
Delhi High Court
Bench
Justice Prathiba M. Singh
Outcome
Dismissed
Date of judgment
11/5/2023

Statutory provisions

Section 3(k), Patents Act 1970 — Exclusions from patentability (business methods, computer programs)Section 2(1)(ja), Patents Act 1970 — Definition of 'inventive step'Section 10(4)(c), Patents Act 1970 — Requirements for sufficiency of disclosure in specificationSection 10(5), Patents Act 1970 — Requirements for definitiveness in claimsSection 11A, Patents Act 1970 — Publication of patent applicationsSection 15, Patents Act 1970 — Power of Controller to refuse or require amended applicationsSection 59, Patents Act 1970 — Amendments to applications and specificationsSection 117A, Patents Act 1970 — Appeals

Key issue

Can a patent be granted for a system and method designed to enable gifting of media, or does such an invention fall under the exclusion for business methods in Indian patent law?

Summary

This case involves an appeal against the refusal of a patent application for a "system and method to provide gift media." The Controller of Patents denied the patent on grounds that the invention constitutes a non-patentable business method under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, and that proposed claim amendments were impermissible. The court reviewed whether claims can be amended during appeal and if the invention is indeed a business method. It determined that while amendments are generally allowed if they don't broaden the scope, the core invention here is a business method, explicitly excluded from patentability in India. The court emphasized that the mere technical implementation of a business method does not make it patentable. Result: Appeal for patent grant dismissed; the invention was deemed a non-patentable business method.

Tags

#patentability#business method#Section 3(k)#claim amendment#appellate review
Judgment PDFOpen in new tab